Seryozha asked an important question in the comments: The answer to the question "why?" is not very clear Overnight I got a hypothesis "Why…

Seryozha asked an important question in the comments: The answer to the question "why?" is not very clear Overnight I got a hypothesis "Why all this" The list of best-selling smartphones over the last 5 years barely changes. It has Apple, Samsung, Xiaomi, Vivo and Oppo. iPhone is consistently in the top positions. It is an object of desire Let us look at the interfaces of some of them. Can you say this is a tracing copy of iOS? It is definitely inspired by it. To the point of confusion Even the pervertedly working AI Writing was copied And Samsung threw into the trash the work done by Pentagram and also tries to mimic the object of desire When you are the leader, especially for a long time, you get copied. Pieces of your identity are bitten off. Your desirability is put on, adding something else to the offer: lower cost, a feeling of greater gain (he has three cameras, I have five!), a feeling of belonging. Like a brown Michael Kors bag with a monogram pattern pretending to be LV. To remain the leader, to remain an object of desire, you need to reinvent yourself. That is what Apple is doing. I think Liquid Glass will restore a gap of several years between the leader and those catching up. It is hard to repeat complex technological solutions. Especially when you do not have that kind of low-level control over hardware and software. By first impressions, this really is a pleasure to use In this key, I want to wish for Google Pixel to start occupying at least some part of the smartphone market. And become a subject for imitation. Then such expressive Material Design will find its place in the world. As will Nothing Phone. We will have more diversity. Higher competition. From which end consumers always benefit Let all flowers bloom